Pantheism updated
   | 
 
| 
   Why pantheism sucks (The) One (GOD/RULE1),
  because same for all,2 has no identity,3
  hence is not communicable. Because not communicable (the) One cannot increase (my) survival capacity,
  therefore sucks.4 My One
  (God/Rule5), hence the One customised6,7,8
  for my9 benefit, has identity, hence is communicable. Because
  communicable My One (God/Rule) increases
  my survival capacity.10,11 In short, pantheism ‘sucks’ because it’s indifferent. ©  2020 by
  Victor Langheld  | 
 
| 
   Analysis (The) One (GOD/RULE1),
  because same for all,2 has no identity,3
  hence is not communicable. Because not communicable (the) One cannot increase (my) survival capacity,
  therefore sucks.4 My One
  (God/Rule5), hence the One customised6,7,8
  for my9 benefit, has identity, hence is communicable. Because
  communicable My One (God/Rule) increases
  my survival capacity.10,11 In short, pantheism
  ‘sucks’ because it’s indifferent. ©  2020 by Victor Langheld  | 
  
   1.      i.e.
  Pantheos, i.e.
  one (unselected) size, shape, hat, lipstick or GOD that fits/suits all hence
  does not give me (or my family, my tribe, my nation) a survival edge (and no
  reason to go to war to murder, pillage and rape, i.e. to predate). 2.      Same
  is ‘not different’, hence cannot make a difference. Sameness lacks attributes
  (i.e. difference), (to wit: Sanskrit: nirguna) which
  alone can communicate. Sameness ensues if and when difference is compressed
  out. Or, to explain it in the ancient Buddhist way: ‘Nirvana ensues if and when painful turbulence (Pali: vana) that causes
  difference subsides.’ 3.      For
  ‘identity’ read: a quantum of difference deriving from the imposition of an
  alternate constraints set/procedure, thus an attribute, that identifies. 4.      Since
  all emergents operate as dynamic, i.e. thermo-dynamic
  procedures, they automatically dissipate (i.e. ‘suck’) energy (i.e. decay) unless
  recharged (by communicating-cum-predating thermo-dynamic quanta identified by
  difference). In short, there’s no communication between the same, hence all dissipate
  to maximum entropy. 5.      i.e.
  Henotheos, i.e.
  the one (selected, hence bespoke) size, shape, hat, lipstick of God fits/suits
  me and so gives me (or my family, my tribe, my nation) a survival edge (i.e.
  as defence mechanism and as reason to go to war and/or murder, pillage and
  rape, i.e. to predate). 6.      For
  ‘customized’ read: selected, tailor-made, bespoke, specifically tweaked,
  adapted, thus cultured. Customized means superimposing a selected (for
  survival increase) rule, hence adaptation, upon the given (or same for all) natural
  (because common to all) rules template. 7.      Hence
  the ancient Greek comment on (the different) religions, namely “Custom,
  custom!” 8.      i.e. differentiated,
  thus identifiable, thus capable of making contact. 9.      Expand ‘my’ to mean: my family, horde, tribe, clan, cluster of like-minded, nation and so on. 10.     My
  (differentiated) ONE God (as monarch and,
  of necessity predator) is identifiable by his/her bespoke difference. As his/her
  adherent or follower I transfer that identity, i.e. his/her tweaked constraints-cum-rules
  set, to myself and behave or identify accordingly. My altered (i.e. henotheist) identity differentiates me from my
  previous peers who had no identity. Their previous identity, lost in
  sameness, now emerges as an alternate identity (i.e. the unbelievers and
  therefore enemies) and who now become legitimate prey. 11.     Hence
  the justifiable denigration of the pantheist
  by the henotheist. For, the pantheist steals the henotheist’s
  thunder by eliminating the latter’s difference (i.e. ego constituents
  as an identifiable self).  |