Every 1 is true

≈ real ≈ perfect ≈ absolute ≈ _GOD ≈ (beautiful) ≈ (good)*

The NOD (i.e. the New Oxford Dictionary) defines ‘true’ as: in accordance with fact or reality.

The NOD defines ‘1’ (derived from the German ‘ein’) wrongly as ‘lowest cardinal number’ and rightly as ‘single’ (to wit, ‘without a second’ (so the Upanishads), hence absolute (meaning wholly independent).

The NOD defines ‘is’ (seriously) wrongly as: ‘third person singular of be’. In fact (i.e. per-factum ≈ perfectly) ‘is’ happens (momentarily) as c² (more precisely stated as q² or bit²) impact/contact (and which happens in a relativity, because prior to others ≈ bite ≈ series of bits) vacuum).

In simpler terms, every 1 (to wit, as whole quantum @ max. or min. entropy) contacted (i.e. struck by or interacted with) happens as true, because real. In ancient India, the word sat meant both ‘true’ and ‘real’. The Buddha first proposed that real/true arises from contact.

In even simpler terms, ‘the only (i.e. the 1 for me) girl/boy/car/beer/god in the world’ is true/real/perfect for me.

By contrast, more than 1, and which creates relativity, is untrue, imperfect, unreal and so on. Time and space are defined by more than 1 (i.e. by series of 1’s) hence (like numbers beyond 1) are measurements of relativity, i.e. of the relationships between (discrete) 1’s.

O.K. a 1c² (better) contact is true, because absolutely real. Hence a 1q² contact/moment defines a basic (i.e. minimum) quantum of knowledge.

*… The next (because different) step ≈ contact is good for me as dynamic bio-system because it adds energy and change of direction and so reverses decay, that is to say, it increases my survival capacity. Increase in survival capacity is self-signalled with happiness. Missing the next because different step, thus remaining the same, is bad for me if fails to reverse decay. Such failure is self-signalled with unhappiness.

In this regard see my book: How to make and fake happiness